Swing Trading Signals


Since 2013

  • 100% Quantified, data-driven and Backtested
  • We always show our results!
  • Signals every day via our site or email
  • Cancel at any time!

Uncovering Trend Rules

Last Updated on 10 February, 2024 by Rejaul Karim

Embarking on an exploration of financial market trends, “Uncovering Trend Rules” by Paul Beekhuizen and Winfried G. Hallerbach, affiliated with Robeco Asset Management and Fintelligence CCT, respectively, challenges the conventional use of moving averages (MAs) in determining market trends.

Released on May 12, 2015, this paper seeks to unravel the obscured historical weighting schemes within price MAs, shedding light on the nuanced dynamics of trend rules. Surprisingly, the study unveils hidden patterns, including inverted information decay and concealed mean-reversion tendencies within popular trend rules.

The findings pave the way for enhanced trend rule design by dissecting the added value of mean reversion components. Advocating for a shift towards designing trend rules based on returns rather than prices, the research emphasizes the flexibility and adaptability that this approach brings, offering a fresh perspective on technical analysis, time series momentum, market timing, and the intricate interplay of moving averages.

Abstract Of Paper

Trend rules are widely used to infer whether financial markets show an upward or downward trend. By taking suitable long or short positions, one can profit from a continuation of these trends. Conventionally, trend rules are based on moving averages (MAs) of prices rather than returns, which obscures how much weight is assigned to different historical time periods. In this paper, we show how to uncover the underlying historical weighting schemes of price MAs and combinations of price MAs. This leads to surprising and useful insights about popular trend rules, for example that some trend rules have inverted information decay (i.e., distant returns have more weight than recent ones) or hidden mean-reversion patterns. This opens the possibility for improving the trend rule by analyzing the added value of the mean reversion part. We advocate designing trend rules in terms of returns instead of prices, as they offer more flexibility and allow for adjusting trend rules to autocorrelation patterns in returns.

Original paper – Download PDF

Here you can download the PDF and original paper of Uncovering Trend Rules.

(An option to download will come shortly)

Author

Paul Beekhuizen
Robeco Asset Management

Winfried G. Hallerbach
Fintelligence CCT

Conclusion

In summary, this study delves into the intricacies of trend rules, challenging conventional methods based on moving averages (MAs) of prices. By unveiling the underlying historical weighting schemes of price MAs, the research sheds light on surprising insights, revealing inverted information decay and hidden mean-reversion patterns in some popular trend rules.

This knowledge offers a pathway for potential improvements, suggesting that analyzing the added value of mean reversion could enhance the efficacy of trend rules.

The paper advocates a shift towards designing trend rules in terms of returns rather than prices, emphasizing the flexibility and adaptability that this approach provides, allowing for adjustments based on autocorrelation patterns in returns. This nuanced understanding of trend rules contributes valuable perspectives to the realm of technical analysis and market timing.

Related Reading:

Trend-Following Strategies for Tail-Risk Hedging and Alpha Generation

Betting Against Correlation: Testing Theories of the Low-Risk Effect

FAQ

Q1: What is the main focus of the paper “Uncovering Trend Rules,” and how does it challenge conventional methods of determining market trends?

The primary focus of the paper is to challenge conventional methods of determining market trends, specifically those based on moving averages (MAs) of prices. The authors aim to unravel the obscured historical weighting schemes within price MAs, providing insights into the dynamics of trend rules that go beyond traditional approaches.

Q2: What surprising insights does the paper reveal about popular trend rules, and how does it suggest improving trend rules based on this information?

The paper unveils surprising insights, including inverted information decay and hidden mean-reversion patterns within some popular trend rules. It suggests that analyzing the added value of the mean reversion part could potentially enhance the efficacy of trend rules. By dissecting these components, the study opens up possibilities for improving the design and understanding of trend rules.

Q3: How does the paper advocate for a shift in designing trend rules, and what benefits does this approach offer in terms of flexibility and adaptability?

The paper advocates a shift towards designing trend rules based on returns rather than prices. This approach offers more flexibility and adaptability, allowing for adjustments based on autocorrelation patterns in returns. By focusing on returns, the authors argue that trend rules can be more finely tuned and responsive to market dynamics, providing a fresh perspective on technical analysis, time series momentum, and market timing.

You can find many more Research Papers here

Leave a Reply

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

Monthly Trading Strategy Club

$42 Per Strategy

>

Login to Your Account



Signup Here
Lost Password