Last Updated on 10 February, 2024 by Rejaul Karim
The influence of institutional ownership on stock market returns has long been a subject of debate and curiosity. In “Institutional Ownership Decomposition and Stock Market Returns,” James Bulsiewicz delves into this tantalizing topic and presents an innovative approach to uncovering the complex relationship between the two.
Examining the trends in institutional ownership, as implied by existing evidence, the author decomposes a stock’s ownership into level, slope, and residual components, while controlling for those trends. The findings demonstrate a relatively weak positive relationship for the level component, a strongly positive relationship for the slope component, and a strongly negative relationship for the residual component.
Interestingly, these connections are most pronounced within arbitrage-constrained stocks, suggesting that financial institutions actively manage their equity positions based on differences and changes in underlying firm fundamentals. By offering a fresh perspective, this research deepens the understanding of institutional ownership and its implications on stock market returns.
Abstract Of Paper
Evidence presented in Dasgupta et al. (2011) indicates that financial institutions can be net buyers or sellers of a stock over consecutive quarters, implying the existence of trends in a stock’s institutional ownership. I investigate the relation between institutional ownership and returns after controlling for trends by decomposing a stock’s institutional ownership into level, slope, and residual components. I find that the level, slope, and residual components have, respectively, positive but relatively weak, strongly positive, and strongly negative relations with returns. These relations are strongest within arbitrage-constrained stocks and are the result of financial institutions investing and actively managing their equity positions based on differences and changes in underlying firm fundamentals.
Original paper – Download PDF
Here you can download the PDF and original paper of Institutional Ownership Decomposition and Stock Market Returns.
(An option to download will come shortly)
Fairleigh Dickinson University
In conclusion, James Bulsiewicz’s “Institutional Ownership Decomposition and Stock Market Returns” offers meaningful insights into the intricate relationships between institutional ownership and stock market returns by carefully controlling for trends and decomposing ownership into its key components.
The study’s findings highlight the varying strength of the relationships – weakly positive for the level component, strongly positive for the slope component, and strongly negative for the residual component. Significantly, these relations become more pronounced within arbitrage-constrained stocks, underscoring the active management of equity positions by financial institutions based on the evolution of firm fundamentals.
By providing a nuanced understanding of the role of institutional ownership in potential stock market returns, this research has the potential to impact investment strategies and contribute to a more profound comprehension of market dynamics, benefiting investors and market participants alike.
Q1: What is the main focus of the research paper “Institutional Ownership Decomposition and Stock Market Returns”?
The research paper investigates the relationship between institutional ownership and stock market returns by decomposing institutional ownership into level, slope, and residual components. It aims to provide a nuanced understanding of how different aspects of institutional ownership influence stock returns.
Q2: What are the key findings regarding the relationship between institutional ownership components and stock returns?
The study reveals that the level component of institutional ownership has a relatively weak positive relationship with stock returns. In contrast, the slope component shows a strongly positive relationship, while the residual component has a strongly negative relationship with stock returns. These relationships imply that financial institutions actively manage their equity positions based on differences and changes in underlying firm fundamentals.
Q3: How do the relationships between institutional ownership components and stock returns vary within the stock market?
The relationships between institutional ownership components and stock returns are found to be most pronounced within arbitrage-constrained stocks. This suggests that financial institutions, when faced with arbitrage constraints, exhibit stronger reactions to differences and changes in firm fundamentals when managing their equity positions.